Earth Science movie review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Earth Science - Movie Review ExampleAre any of the characters nobbleing scientists? How be these characters portrayed? Geeky or cool? This plastic film has many characters playing the role of scientists extremely part of the movie had its own reason and the parts were clear well. The casts had different roles to play in the movie making the movie to start a flow that to the viewer. The best part of the movie is the coordination that was there between the casts some scenes were direct to the dapple meaning they did not require any scripting one had to put his words that fit the story well. The tar frustrate to set by NASA to stop an asteroid on a collision course with the earth was successful (Robert 4). What parts of the movie were scientifically accurate? I.e. what happened that was actually possible and correctly portrayed? The Armageddon movie involves beef thrills narrow escapes and explosions. Extremely thing in the movie is the superb content and it is attractive to the eyes of the viewer the lighting and the change of scenes in the movie are correctly timed (Rick 2). The scientists are also extremely well equipped this makes the movie to be real and appealing, this movie if its accuracy is to be compared to talk shows it whitethorn be Oprahs show. ... The directors should have also used the most equipments for astronomy to improve the content. This movie gives many flashlights to the viewer. Were there parts of the movie that may have been possible, but were likely mislead for entertainment purposes? The building of a comet that was to head to the earth, the comet had larger bunkers that could keep up to a million people. This was fiction and the incident that they represent two hundred thousand people with significant jobs to get into the bunker. At the end, the comet does not hit the earth surface, and people still survive. This part of the movie was exaggerated because in real sense, this is something that can be done but the number of peopl e in the comet seems to be significant, if the number was little this could be argued to be fact (Yoram 9). The number of people, who were in the movie, should be significant because the movie talks about extremely many things at once. Reflect on the movie as a whole. Would it have been as interesting or entertaining if it had been scientifically accurate? If the movie was scientific it would have been extremely easy for people to understand, if a person many people understand what they see if there is no fiction in the characters taking part in the movie. The scientific technology that in the movie is easy to digest so if any were improvement made then the movie would have been interesting. Some people may just not get in mind what is happening by listening to the words, by watching what is in the movie makes them understand even more and seeing what you have neer seen. The word Armageddon is derived from scary thoughts. This word means too many people that its destruction of