Conclusion of online contract Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 6000 words

Conclusion of online contract - Research Paper ExampleNowadays, more than and more people turn to online agreements, sometimes even preferring them to the traditional written ones. However, consumers cannot help concerning about the hardness of the online contracts versus the common written contracts. Yet, Electronic contracts and electronic signatures are just as legal and enforceable as traditional paper contracts signed in ink.1 This fact was established by the Electronic Signatures in Global and International Commerce Act (ESGICA) in 2000, which has updated the status of online agreements, considering them just as legal and enforceable as the written ones.This topic has been chosen due to the growing popularity of the online agreements among the ordinary users and other interested people. The margin paper is focused on revealing the essence of the online agreements. The author believes that such a paper is necessary, because of the boost number of concluded online agreements. Sometimes, a user is not even aware of the fact that he is blanket himself to a contract in the online jungle.The online contracts are mostly governed by the same legal traditional principles as the written contracts, consisting of the same elements. The majority of the electronic agreements is reduced to the click through and click wrap agreements. These types of contracts get hold of that the user should scroll through the terms and conditions on a website and confirm that he or she has repeat the terms and conditions of the agreement by taking some sort of follow up, such as clicking an I accept button or by taking some similar action. It is very often that the enforceability of the forum plectron clause in these click-wrap agreements is at issue since these clauses may force the plaintiff to bring his or her action in a particular jurisdiction, which may be located far away from the plaintiffs home jurisdiction, in order to settle all disputes.The author intends to